Pros And Cons Of CRG (Contextual Research Gap)

Pros And Cons Of CRG (Contextual Research Gap)

Jun 26, 2023

CRG gap is the gap of knowledge that isn’t present in research. It may be based on measuring techniques or the description of a specific concept from a contextual perspective to ensure that it becomes more relevant in a particular research.

Contextual research gap offers researchers the opportunity to have a clear understanding of the best techniques to use in measuring or defining a variable according to the existing context.

So, when a researcher decides to use a variable based on measurement or definition of a specific context, the result is often more beneficial compared to when the researcher does the opposite.

When using the CRG concept, the regional, global, local, or type of research may vary. These are some of the pros and cons of using the CRG concept.

Pros of Contextual Research Gap

  • With CRG, a study variable will have a much higher level of importance. When a researcher discovers the appropriate contextual research gap definition or measures for a specific research variable, the probability of playing a vital role in a model becomes high.
  • As soon as a researcher can determine the right measurement or contextual definition, there will be a better understanding, and the accompanying empirical model will become more valid.
  • Some researchers may need help understanding what a good CRG entails but with the right one; researchers can create or design theories that will be helpful in future studies.
  • When done the right way, CRG also creates a fresh understanding of the previous study, helping to improve the study and any future research.
  • Different types of techniques are often used in research to ensure that the outcome comes out perfectly.
  • CRG helps you determine the proper techniques to choose during the research process. This way, you can get the best result without spending too much time.

Cons of Contextual Research Gaps

  • Despite its many pros and benefits, there are some discrepancies among researchers. Many researchers find the term – contextual research gap – very confusing. So, the word has been misused during research leading to wrong research findings and analysis.
  • The contextual research gap is also not widely known. Only some parts of it are used, while some are not used, which makes it less beneficial to researchers.
  • It’s also often difficult to tell the difference between contextual research gaps and other gap types, which leads to having different types of gaps, with some not adding any beneficial value to the research.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *